Cookie Policy

This website uses cookies to provide technical functionality, improve the user experience and help us optimizing the website for our users. Find out more in our Privacy Policy

Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the function and operation of this website. Without these cookies we would not be able to offer you services such as contact forms and territory selection. These cookies collect anonymous information and cannot track your movements on other websites.

Show CookiesHide Cookies

Name

Domain

__ga

censhare.com

__gid

censhare.com

allowCookies

censhare.com

prefGeo

censhare.com

Performance Cookies

These cookies collect information about how you use our website. This enables us to identify which parts of our website are particularly popular and thus improve our offer for you. These cookies do not save information that would allow the user to be identified. The collected information is aggregated, and therefore anonymous.

Show CookiesHide Cookies

Name

Domain

__hssc

censhare.com

__hssrc

censhare.com

__hstc

censhare.com

_vwo_uuid_v2

censhare.com

hubspotutk

hubspot.com

__gat_UA-8

censhare.com

Marketing Cookies

Marketing Cookies are being used to deliver adverts and other communications relevant to you and your interests, to limit the number of times you see an advertisement and to help measure the effectiveness of advertising campaigns.

Show CookiesHide Cookies

Name

Domain

1P_JAR:

google.de

CONSENT

google.de

NID

google.de

globe icon

Diese Webseite ist auch auf Deutsch verfügbar.

Region auswählenUS - English
Region auswählenUS - English
Blog

Google's rebranding explained

Google’s decision to rebrand came as a shock. The world’s third most valuable brand would become cog within a larger machine, henceforth known as ‘Alphabet’. But why?

Brand identity

Writing in Marketing Magazine , Jim Prior waxes lyrical about the value of the Google brand, and laments Alphabet’s comparative failure to capture "the specialness of the corporation, nor its ambition, long-term view, empowerment, [or] scale". What Mr. Prior fails to realise is that this is exactly the point.

Google had begun to represent the enormous, multifarious and sometimes unfathomable visions of founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin. Alphabet is the clean and simple organiser into which we now see this bundle of ideas neatly divided. As easy as ABC. No need for EU antitrust cases here. Even if these persist, the negative PR can be contained. Google is a separate subsidiary now.

Winning over Wall Street

Investors were also questioning Google’s "narrative" and demanding greater transparency, particularly regarding the cost of ambitious new business ideas.

Under the Alphabet regime, " G is for Google ", which remains in the capable hands of Sundar Pichai . Other, more speculative ventures will be run independently – each with its own chief executive, reporting separately.

SIt’s no coincidence either that Larry Page compares his business approach to that of Warren Buffet , whose Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate successfully combines numerous industrial assets and investments. Page believes he can do the same, and wants Wall Street in agreement.

It looks like the plan is working already. Google shares jumped 7% after the rebranding, and the media is awash with analysts and investors praising the new "transparent" structure.

Freeing creative minds

Meanwhile, Page and Brin are free to pursue their speculative ventures without such intense media and analyst attention – a benefit they’re not hiding.

In his blog post announcing the rebrand , Page reiterated their founding cry: "Google is not a conventional company. We do not intend to become one", adding that "Sergey and I are seriously in the business of starting new things".

What’s changed is that investors can see what’s being spent on these ventures, and a clearer route to market for the successful ones . Consumers, too, no longer see one name looming large – they see lots of exciting ideas run by independent tech leaders.

Well played, Alphabet.

censhare Editorial Team censhare Editorial Team

We asked around the office to find out who wrote this and everyone stepped forward and said "I'm the author", our mistake was that we were offering cake.

Comments