Martech in its various forms is clearly a boon when it comes to enabling a best-of-class customer experience, but what if your legacy systems need updating? We discuss moving to next stage of content architecture.
Blog

Content Management for New Times

Whether the pandemic brought a slew of new opportunities, or magnified the challenges created by existing digital transformation plans, organizations have had to be more on the ball than ever to keep up with the pace of change. Populations may have been locked down; employees furloughed, but the drive for best-in-class customer experience has never stopped.

It’s easy to say the customer demands more, but what does that mean?

‘More’ means more accurate information, updated in real time, accessible on the platform of the customer’s choosing. It means a customer journey that evolves seamlessly, delivering the right information at the right time, again, regardless of platform.

Getting this right is a complex task, and even then, it is increasingly just table stakes. On top of accuracy and availability come all the layers that drive brand consideration and loyalty – empathy, personalization, creativity and more. Marketers have their work cut out.

Of course, martech (Marketing Technology) in its various forms is clearly a boon when it comes to enabling a best-of-class customer experience but putting this in place can seem to be a mammoth task. Martech is a hugely fragmented marketplace with a vast array of solutions. How each fits with existing tech stacks, how completely each system or platform can solve a company’s particular challenge, can be a minefield.

Moving to Next Stage Content Architecture

In Building Content Systems For A New Era , Peter O’Neill, Industry Analyst and former research director for B2B marketing at Forrester working with B2B Marketing and Research in Action explores how marketers can make the best choices when it comes to reviewing their martech architecture.

Many companies are realizing that they do need a more holistic content architecture that incorporates text, all the digital media assets plus data about the consumer of the content to ensure personalization and relevance. Historically, companies have maintained different systems and teams. A CMS here a DAM (Digital Asset Management) over there and a PIM (Product Information Management) down there,” O’Neill says. “It’s no longer effective to treat these things in their own siloes."

Does this mean companies need to reject every system and setup they’ve had so far? Not necessarily, but it does mean businesses need to make effective choices in the next generation of technologies. They need to be able to choose systems that won’t just integrate into their existing martech stacks, and tie systems together effectively, but ones that will be able to perform more independently in the future as the older, legacy technologies move towards a more natural obsolescence.

It’s not just the systems that need to talk to each other easily. The various departments – often also siloed – must be able to communicate effectively. This often means finding systems that show the relevant information to the right people but in a uniform and easily digestible format. “How often do you see martech stacks bought from various vendors with different interfaces, taxonomies and it’s very difficult for marketers to communicate with each other if the systems are telling them different information. There really must be a push within all marketing organizations to standardize those efforts,” O’Neill insists.

Make the Right Choice

When the number of vendor and solution choices seems overwhelming, marketers and their teams need information at their fingertips that is concise, accurate and speaks to their own specific needs. O’Neill revealed during his presentation that he was about to release a report on Brand Content Management , or BCM.

“The survey defines how you automate a business or marketing process,” O’Neill explains. “We don’t talk about categories of technology. We have a business-led approach. Then we ask the respondents to identify the major drivers and inhibitors to investment. We get feedback about a vendor for that topic, asking what they think about their product, their strategy and vision, if they’re innovative and even ask them if they’d recommend the vendor to a peer.”

The survey then goes to the vendors themselves to find out more about their go-to-market strategy, paying particular attention to the investment the vendors are making in customer success.

“Across the DAM and PIM surveys, around 25% are looking for brand new systems and a further 25% are looking for a replacement,” O’Neill reveals. He outlines the ideal process for taking large-scale Martech decisions: “I stress two important factors. One, understanding that the selection should be based on the longest-term strategy. Marketers can’t afford to buy software for one team or process. It must fit together. There must be a team of people planning the Martech stack.

“Two, have a design-thinking approach. It should be collaborative, involving all users, management including procurement and legal – and the vendors themselves. Cut your list down as quickly as possible on rough product suitability to two or three vendors. Then run a more detailed test scenario with each of those vendors. Bring the staff together and test for friction in the relationship,” he concludes.

O’Neill acknowledges that there will be no single solution that is a perfect fit for any business. The idea is to find a solution that covers most of the most important bases. Any gaps can be filled with low-code alternatives, vendor workarounds or internal fixes. But again, a lack of rigidity is to be welcomed – the perfect solution today will inevitably not suit the business of tomorrow. “Making systems flexible is definitely possible and those will be the successful software solutions of the future,” O’Neill predicts.

Hear Peter O’Neill’s full assessment of the future of content systems and how you can make better Martech choices, watch his presentation at censhare’s ecosphere days digital 2021, exclusively here .

The implementation of censhare for all campaigns and channels has brought extreme increase in efficiency and falling costs for Vitra.

Building Content Systems For A New Era

Established independent industry analyst Peter O’Neill discusses how recent events have challenged existing strategies, and how he sees the market pivoting for future

Learn More
Lucy Campbell-Woodward Lucy Campbell-Woodward

Lucy ist Digital Marketing Managerin und Blog-Autorin bei censhare. In München zuhause, spielt Lucy eine zentrale Rolle im Corporate Marketing Team, immer mit Blick darauf, die Content-Maschinen am Laufen zu halten. Was ihr Lebenslauf allerdings nicht verrät, ist ihr beeindruckendes Wissen über bayerisches Bier. Prost!

Post
Cookie-Erklärung

Diese Webseite verwendet Cookies und Tracking-Tools von Drittanbieter, um die technische Funktionalität sicherzustellen, das Benutzererlebnis zu verbessern und uns dabei zu helfen, die Webseite für unser Besucher zu optimieren. Erfahren Sie mehr in unserer Datenschutzerklärung

Notwendige Cookies

Diese Cookies sind für die Funktionen der Webseite erforderlich und erleichtern deren Bedienung. Ohne diese Cookies könnten wir Ihnen z.B. Dienste wie Kontaktformulare und Regionsauswahl nicht anbieten. Diese Cookies sammeln anonymisierte Informationen, sie können nicht Ihre Bewegungen auf anderen Websites verfolgen.

Cookies anzeigenCookies ausblenden

Name

Domain

_hs_opt_out

censhare.com

_hssc

censhare.com

_hssrc

censhare.com

_hstc

censhare.com

_ga

censhare.com

_gid

censhare.com

allowCookies

censhare.com

hsfirstvisit

censhare.com

hubspotutk

censhare.com

prefGeo

censhare.com

Marketing Cookies

Cookies für Marketingzwecke werden genutzt, um gezielt relevante Werbeinhalte für den Nutzer auszuspielen, die Erscheinung von Anzeigen zu steuern und die Effektivität von Werbekampagnen zu messen.

Cookies anzeigenCookies ausblenden

_gat_UA-82154913-1

censhare.com

hubspotutk

censhare.com